Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
戏中Cutter瞒天过海的连环骗把几波人耍的团团转，戏外Mark Rylance精湛的演技令我拍手叫绝。一间房子又是柜里藏尸emmmm…《夺魂索》版权费付一下（bushi
但这，不恰恰是问题吗。
《套装》很像希区柯克的《夺魂索》或波兰斯基的《杀戮》，封闭空间内来回穿梭，桌子底下有个大炸弹，一直维持着悬疑张力。《套装》并非完美无缺，虽然编织精巧，但受限于逼仄场景，无法展现真实黑帮氛围，很难想象一个纵横芝加哥的黑帮就这么几条枪几个人，在连续剧里挺不过前两集。故事也有些不合理之处，伦纳德下了盘超级复杂的大棋，但很多环节都在碰运气，里奇的中枪和弗朗西斯出门找播放设备不太可能事先预料到。
疫情将电影成本控制的还是不错的，但也没有好到让人叫绝，顶多是在今年平庸的一大片电影中出彩了些罢了。
虽然舞台剧的感觉有点浓，但仍然非常值得一看
一如既往地干！往死里干！马东锡10年终于混出来了！看到的是重拳出击，估计也得上百磅吧？忽然想起之前说泰森和成龙打，谁会赢？泰森的拳头好像有几百磅吧，一头牛都能干死，别说人了。在绝对力量面前什么套路都是白搭！马东锡加油啊
这个故事交给盖里奇或者昆汀，可能在三十分钟内就结束了。当我看到二十分钟的时候就已经猜到了全部的故事。但我没有料到的是这个故事会被拍得这么冗长而无聊。
〖20220413〗之前肯定看过，又看一遍。
孙锡久好帅！！应该是这两年最亮眼的韩国男演员！都有点夺目了啊. 性张力拉满.
男主演技是真的不错 但是这种话剧风格的电影还是不太合适我
嘴巴子战神，阿西吧王者马东锡已上线，喜剧成分比第一部多 但是打斗场景很过瘾 新的反派boss依旧残暴 但是和第一部的哈尔滨张谦蛋比还是差点 在嘴巴子战神的面前力量还是显而易见 一🦶直接踹飞 马东锡简直是超级赛亚人的存在 不知道个延边战神哪个战斗力更强
我会把这种片子推荐给所有喜欢反转的朋友。但是在我看来，只是一种生硬的优秀的话剧剧本。
电影像裁剪好的西装一样严丝合缝，看完更加决定今年一定要买两套优雅的套装。
封闭空间的文戏让我中途睡着了一次，醒来发现剧情居然还觉接得上。反转再反转，最后发现都是男主早设计好的，年轻时也曾轻狂，社会人一个。不知道为啥男主能确定Francis 能把女主牵扯进来…逻辑没搞懂。
还可以。老头这是为了啥？为了女秘书？还是路见不平？ 有点拉垮
精巧的设计，所有场景都在一个裁缝店中完成，拍成舞台剧也是可以的。商业爆米花看多了，其实感觉这种精巧的电影更有吸引力。
外加最后结局的神级演技
不好看，故事老套，主角开挂，反派在遇见马东锡之前都是各种能打能杀，一遇上主角马东锡 立马歇菜成弱鸡一拳就给放倒，这戏马东锡名副其实的一拳超人
前半段或许有点太容易猜到了，除了男主之外的其他角色智商也不太顶用
没预期惊喜，但还是很喜欢。第一反应是国内翻拍啊，又一想，别糟践好东西了
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
