Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
4、我对前作表示认可，因为前作是个相对成功的翻拍，但我对挂羊头卖狗肉系列衍生，且去除了原作精华用烂俗的情感戏来替代的翻拍作品表示恶心
还行吧，就是这种架空故事发生在哪儿都可以就是
煽情有点过。反正林日朗必须死，就算不是为了某个理由，审查制度也会杀死他。
肖央有进步，但就是离不开/不愿意离开陈某某，可悲可叹
两星半。这样靠着反转吸引观众的片子，节奏一慢就容易让人失去耐心，至少前一个小时有些太平缓了，后半部分反转一出就应该及时止损，结果还要多拍个结尾扣前面的铺垫，强行升华父爱主题。当然，这招对很多观众来说应该很催泪。调侃女性家暴的情节着实招人烦。
【5.6】
此片翻拍自美国电影《迫在眉梢》，讲的是父亲因孩子得不到心脏移植，绑架医院里的人质要挟警察的故事。别的不说，肖央、任达华的表演还是值得欣赏的。不过细看还是有不少bug的，一些细节欠推敲，比如急救儿子时，夫妻还能在旁边看，狙击手一枪，一块金牌居然能挡子弹等。
好久没进电影院了，包场的感觉真好。有原著打底，真是破船也有三根钉，有趣的部分全是藤子·F.不二雄的，改编部分实在毫无必要（你说你搞一个姐姐形象干啥，原作本来就有无性别的象征意味，隐喻最广泛的人被压迫），不如老老实实出个重制版。不过，幼时看只觉得有趣，现在看才发现左翼艺术家的笔法。这本质上还是一个走向gh与恢复dz角力的故事（这样得故事如今是越来越少见了），流亡总统和将军真是怎么看怎么眼熟。异星人依靠人类确立了天赐的权力，如今人类自己却身处两难的岔路口，看不到未来……
这个没天赋又爱装逼的陈思诚，真的是我国电影界的毒瘤。除了魔改和乱入，就是一股脑的骗钱。
越来越喜欢肖央了，他演一个平凡但深情的爸爸很有说服力，虽然知道结尾但还是为了这个爸爸落泪了
心想他还蛮适合这种斯文败类的
二星半
4、我对前作表示认可，因为前作是个相对成功的翻拍，但我对挂羊头卖狗肉系列衍生，且去除了原作精华用烂俗的情感戏来替代的翻拍作品表示恶心
等了两年等到了误杀2，不是完全的原班人马，但还是有着熟悉的面孔肖央。准确来说，两部误杀没有任何关系，误杀2也不是误杀的续集。可以说这次又是以一个全新的故事和全新视角出发，以家庭为主题。整部电影观看下来之后，感觉演员演技堪称炸裂，电影质感属实高级，电影运景和角度切换拿捏到位。没有炒冷饭，一部佳作了属于是。
这是一部打两星有点少但打三星又确实多的片子，首先来说刚开始的画面质感和运镜还挺唬人的，但这种假象持续的时间没有超过十分钟，接下来就是完全没有惊喜的剧情，是可以毫不费力就能猜到的结局，是剧本的硬伤和导演平庸。一整个看完最直接的感受就是编剧和导演都把它当行活干了，没花几分心思在里面，或者就是奔着踩观众的共情点去的，刻意整了一部“对不起观众，但对得起投资方”的套路之作。看完了才来评价，是我对这片子最大的尊重了，真是白瞎好演员了。
虽然有些地方逻辑扯淡，但是整体立意很不错，前后有呼应，镜头感也不错，现实感强。
这个应该配合《扬名立万》看 但是不应该起名《误杀2》应该叫《一颗心脏的诞生》
整部戏全靠肖和任的演技支撑，，李治廷出场的时候还有人在问是不是王力宏，笑死谁了。
某种意义上讲不算续集，这个“误杀”冲击力更强，叙事和冲突都更直接，一个父亲编造了一个“故事”先骗到了自己，再骗到了别人。除了《迫在眉梢》，推荐大家也去看另一个跟心脏有关的故事07年的《Awake》，希望也能看到中国版。
正好上映这天儿子生日，看着儿子开心得大叫，仿佛看到了年幼时看机器猫的自己，必须好评
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
