剧情介绍

  Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
  The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
  From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

评论:

  • 晨嘉 7小时前 :

    继《1917》之后又一部伪一镜到底的影片,还是有限场景内的枪战动作片,完整记录从受袭到防御再到反击的全过程,动作较专业,打斗也真实,除开头有点慢热之外,其余时间基本无尿点。出乎意料地好看!一般像这样小格局的动作片剧情都是比较弱智狗血的,但这部片子意外地地不粗糙不空洞,很多细节的铺垫与反转都交代得清楚自洽,如那张胎儿B超影像原来竟是关键道具!阿金斯拍了一部好片,也让我们看到了他的努力和进步。希望可以看到他更多的不同尝试!

  • 晓远 1小时前 :

    能看得出一镜到底的设计感隐藏了剪辑点。几乎采用了所有主要正反面人物的视角跟拍,最终将一段一段的长镜头串在一起,而几乎找不到剪辑点的技术活。打游戏的感觉还是很过瘾的。

  • 腾婉仪 7小时前 :

    唉这么好的cast却演了什么wanyi,无聊的都想玩手机了pengyou

  • 阮乐天 6小时前 :

    一镜到底挺酷,就是前面有点晕。还有吃鸡选手果然需要耐强体力

  • 晨天 7小时前 :

    这个形式还是有点意思的,所以给四星鼓励一下。剧本一般,有个别比较亮眼的地方,但也有很多时候让人感觉编得不怎么考究。

  • 枚白风 6小时前 :

    镜头“推拉摇移”很随性……很多长镜头,但这样的伪DV模式据说拍摄起来很有技术难度,要求各个层面都有一定高度。所以这是一部被表面低估的作品,分数低也有可能是剧情短板吧。

  • 玄方方 6小时前 :

    可惜了末日的大背景,总体是一个凄美的爱情故事。

  • 蓝曼文 4小时前 :

    看着很过瘾的一部一镜到底的小成本电影,过分突出主角性格,枪战很爽很暴力!!

  • 麴高格 8小时前 :

    7.9如果没有最后二十分钟个人秀打斗戏,可以8分以上,斯科特目前演的最好的一部,他的电影多是无脑打片,这次伪一镜到底剧情节奏都还不错,揭露穆类人间垃圾邪恶丑恶

  • 蓬平露 4小时前 :

    一shot到底,群演不容易啊。很是精彩。虽然场景就两个,主要还是小区内。一车坏人打不完,阿金斯就是美国版战狼,人弹引爆之后的惨烈,其实这里不需要人弹吧!要杀人灭口搞几个RPG炸了这个小区不行吗?

  • 珊俊 7小时前 :

    看的时候感觉阿金斯有演John Wick的潜质

  • 槐家 7小时前 :

    动作片里不拖泥带水不谈情说爱,简直清流。拳拳到肉,一击必杀。还不错。

  • 紫彤 2小时前 :

    一镜到底的动作让人感觉就是真实,但源源不断的敌人便当太随意了,战斗素质都没有。

  • 桂格 8小时前 :

    没搞懂啊祖的台词为什么要夹杂着中英文混合在一起

  • 雯采 4小时前 :

    好看啊,我觉得是我看过最好看的一部阿金斯了。临场感特别强,喜欢玩《细胞分裂》的没理由会不喜欢这部吧,整体设计就很像是第六部的一个关卡。

  • 锦潍 2小时前 :

    本片虽然从海报到制作都透露着一丢丢低劣的气息,在光影和摄影的运用上也远远不及萨姆·门德斯的《1917》,但用一镜到底的手法拍摄如此密集的枪战和打斗,导演如此复杂的场面调度着实出彩。晃动的镜头和朴素的摄影反而给电影增加了更多的真实性,走廊的枪战和斯科特左刀右枪一路潜行击杀去调试无线电的桥段可圈可点,没有花哨的动作,刀杀干净利落,紧张感十足。不过影片后半段的枪战也因为处理得太过干净,有一种主角在玩吃鸡游戏的感觉,反而显得精彩不足,有些虎头蛇尾了。(潜心那段太有《杀手》的感觉了哈哈哈)

  • 琪香 9小时前 :

    三星的故事,一镜到底加一分。开局很晃,感觉摄影师有点晕机。喜欢这种一镜到底的编排,爽、紧张、压力和意外全部被挤压到有限时间,值得反复观摩学习。

  • 纪又菡 0小时前 :

    打斗枪战都挺不错,全片一镜到底是亮点,真牛!一部合格的爆米花电影

  • 玲优 2小时前 :

    挺硬核的,拳拳到肉,小场景小成本能拍成这样很不错!

  • 琦柔雅 9小时前 :

    前半截太拖沓了,节奏明显可以再紧凑一些的。世界观有了,但是为了专注爱情主线并没有过多描述。结尾还是有些扎心的,水箱里无限循环回忆怎么进食和排泄呢?

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved