The issue of War widow representation in Israeli cinema is one of the most complex for the local industry for it seems to be unique and with a very local and specific iconography.
The war Widow is a difficult character to digest. Because this is an especially painful topic in Israel, its mode of representation is almost always problematic.
Gila Almagor in Tofano's "siege" is one of the first characters of the "modern" war widows to appear on Israeli cinema screens.
The human and social complexity of the status of widows was not represented adequately and personally until her complex and fine appearance in this film.
It was mostly Preceded by cliches of heroic women who have sacrificed for the nation with characters to which it was very difficult to get attached, nor to their personal grief.
"Siege" was directed by an unknown Italian director of that period. Although Gilberto Tofano was brought as a professional director on the wings of inspiration made by the French New Wave of those years, he managed to turn out a very exciting work which has caught the Israeli warmth and sense of social siege which surrounds the Israeli widows, including the great expectations from them and the social stigmas.
Tofano wrapped his leading lady with lots of warmth and gave a place of honor to Almagor's impressive presence in the film.
This is without a doubt one of Almagor's best and most accurate performances. The restraint in her performance plus the shooting and expressive use of angles by Tofano and his soft European touch which was far off from the aggressive local product managed to produce a sense of documenting an authentic tragedy with a tangible personal touch that minimized the national dimension. The result stands the test of time proudly several decades after its creation.
把颁奖季流行的精美的食材都放进锅里煮了一锅汤，喝起来却没有任何味道，不知道是我喝多了汤还是汤太寡淡了。
看什么都不知道。。。
又是大爽文，最后十五分钟高能。不过技法上还是有些技巧的，偏斜的摄影机增强紧张感和不确定。虽然很多高智能产品了，最终打败boss还是土法炼钢那套。还顺便表达了怪人帮怪人，抱团取暖。
Again and again, Aaron Sorkin proved to be just a mediocre director
索金的剧本依然犀利 可拍摄手法太过于工匠 穿插回忆和现实的两条线处理很一般 Lucy Ball的故事在老美应该更为熟悉 两位主演的表演可圈可点 妮可基德曼真的应该少打点针 脸好僵
6.5 一个女人的追求和辛酸。故事了无新意。但演员都很出彩。妮可基德曼真是一个厉害的演员，能让观众共情。
每个角色都很棒，男女主角和男女配角都很给力。导演也很会讲故事，两条时间线穿插。不知道为什么分数这么低，我给五星。每年的奥斯卡都很巧，刚看了两部都是在拍戏，都提到了万尼亚舅舅。
毕竟我开始喜欢他时就是因为日落大道60号演播室
最后一幕的失神忘词，全片的动情时刻
2. 办公电脑Windows，个人电脑MacBook
不是说故事就不行或者没意义，但Sorkin你嚷啥？整个制作看似精良实则多余，没有给观众代入的空间~说到底，Sorkin看不起他的观众，不过当要讲的是时代精神，自由抗争的时候，观众有耐心忍下傲慢仔细探寻也给一点credit，当讲的是好莱坞自high的舞台背后家常里短，想要见微知著的时候，观众只会感觉到Sorkin的自我感动和自以为是~
轻盈地游走于现实和影像，于是我们终于有了一部关于当下的合格类型片。
最后竟然不是和胖子在一起吗？what？故事节奏稍微慢了点，前面社恐的描画多了些，毕竟谁不社恐？不用再体会一遍了吧……
一流编剧二流导演Sorkin跳出了舒适区，于是两方面都成了二流。
#小两口的午后影院
【B+】以疫情时代的语境去再现《后窗》和《对话》的类型基调，却又保持着与前辈们的疏离。真正干涉故事中心的物理窗口仅有三户，只在短暂的视角转换才能提炼出被窥视感，屏幕上的网络窗口也是一种低分辨率的假象，在开场的轴线跳跃中刺破伪装。或许声音才是关键，就像第一幕中对封闭独居状态的刻画，声音的侵入与回避是观众同环境互动的通道，也同样与第二幕中的开放空间进行区分，因为环境音将角色包围，无法逃避，正如疫情下的生活一般。于是索德伯格所擅长的步态影像在这部分里异化为失衡的仰视构图，手持摄影的晃动感却从未逃离作者操控，层层算计下驱动影像不断前进。随后回到室内完成剧作回环，最后的反杀宛如命题作文的切题步骤一般陈旧，似乎不必过分关注科技的作用，摇镜和运镜间不断流动的物质世界才足够动人。
流媒体定制小片子，甲方在上，成本受限，所以功力只显三成？
竟然有种在看肥皂剧里面拍肥皂剧的感觉，没有表现出人物的重点个性，叙事上过于平凡了
剧情很boring 为了冲奥而冲奥的电影
美国黑镜之天猫精灵……女孩儿也太酷了吧！第一次看海王继女演戏，气质真棒！
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
