Future of Food In the past year, we have seen food riots on three continents, food inflation has rocketed and experts predict that by 2050, if things don't change, we will see mass starvation across the world. This film sees George Alagiah travel the world in search of solutions to the growing global food crisis. From the two women working to make their Yorkshire market town self-sufficient to the academic who claims it could be better for the environment to ship in lamb from New Zealand, George Alagiah meets the people who believe they know how we should feed the world as demand doubles by the middle of the century.
【India】
George joins a Masai chief among the skeletons of hundreds of cattle he has lost to climate change and the English farmer who tells him why food production in the UK is also hit. He spends a day eating with a family in Cuba to find out how a future oil shock could lead to dramatic adjustments to diets. He visits the breadbasket of India to meet the farmer who now struggles to irrigate his land as water tables drop, and finds out why obesity is spiralling out of control in Mexico.
Back in Britain, George investigates what is wrong with people's diets, and discovers that the UK imports an average of 3000 litres of water per capita every day. He talks to top nutritionist Susan Jebb, DEFRA minister Hilary Benn and Nobel laureate Rajendra Pachauri to uncover what the future holds for our food.
【Senegal】
George heads out to India to discover how a changing diet in the developing world is putting pressure on the world's limited food resources. He finds out how using crops to produce fuel is impacting on food supplies across the continents. George then meets a farmer in Kent, who is struggling to sell his fruit at a profit, and a British farmer in Kenya who is shipping out tonnes of vegetables for our supermarket shelves. He also examines why so many people are still dying of hunger after decades of food aid.
Back in the UK, George challenges the decision-makers with the facts he has uncovered - from Oxfam head of research Duncan Green to Sainsbury's boss Justin King. He finds out why British beef may offer a model for future meat production and how our appetite for fish is stripping the world's seas bare.
【Cuba】
In the final episode George Alagiah heads out to Havana to find out how they are growing half of their fruit and vegetables right in the heart of the city, investigates the 'land-grabs' trend - where rich countries lease or buy up the land used by poor farmers in Africa - and meets the Indian agriculturalists who have almost trebled their yields over the course of a decade.
George finds out how we in this country are using cutting-edge science to extend the seasons recycle our food waste and even grow lettuce in fish tanks to guarantee the food on our plates.
He hears the arguments about genetically modified food and examines even more futuristic schemes to get the food on to our plates.
非常现实的故事，也非常克制的表现手法，影片最后的处理也算是恰达好处。但还是觉得作者想放进去的东西太多，让影片想表达的主旨太满，观后感觉有些五味杂陈，或者说是有点如鲠在喉的感觉。如果故事主线单纯一些，只是聚焦在父亲身上，表现父亲在痛惜爱女过世后逐步实现与自己，与世界的和解，或许会更能让人有所触动；又或者以平均主义结构描述一场本不该发生的事故为关联的每个人带来的冲击与改变，以群像视角展现人生的无奈，为观众带来感叹与唏嘘，也比现在整体平衡感缺失更好些吧。但总的来说还是一部视角独特的现实主义好作品，父亲的角色表演尤其给力，值得推荐。
海边的曼彻斯特是独白，这是群像，社会事件，多米诺骨牌效应，角度复杂多变。古田新太厉害👍🏻
还是很不错的。尽管看预告片大概能够猜到电影的情节。非常日式的电影，可以看到他们心灵的方方面面。故事果然是浓重的忧郁色彩里最后透露出那么一丝光亮的氛围。有一点心疼桃李桑，感觉好多戏里他都是在演这种苦情的角色，就算演坏人也有种苦情感（个人感觉）。人还是要懂得和解，尤其是与自己。
平平无奇，在同类题材里属于看过就忘的平庸水平。
镜头，颜色，妆容处理富有美感；
十分讽刺当今电影现状--倒不是像老马丁说的那种电影院被“主题公园”电影充斥着、挤出了“艺术电影”或者真正的电影。大部分的好电影，似乎都会参加某种电影节。电影入围之后，就可以在片头印上那个电影节的logo。进入“主竞赛”单元则更是种荣誉。片名不止于此。两位男主分别代表了传统和学术派以及流量和商业大制作的对立，他们之间的竞争也是现在威尼斯电影节主竞赛单元之间的竞争。除了母题之外，诸多细节也颇有趣味。比如戏中狡诈的弟弟杀死了踏实本分的哥哥的桥段在戏外得到实现。学术派“大师”的漂白牙，我们也可以在发布会女导演的口中见到。导演们为了表达电影到底有多虚伪，上述例子不一而足。最后提出的电影究竟何时终止的问题，则像是在说，作者停笔则“作者已死”，但是电影
伏笔设置还挺巧妙的，不过影片节奏挺拉胯....还好有三位主演精彩的表演
在整体故事系统的编排上，以排练作戏剧与影像的分割线，而影像本身对于现实的“复原”，意味着表象下的解构，这种所谓还原主义式的戏剧排演，洽洽讽刺着公众对于原型与意识形态的“渴望”。这是整个系统层次可以在商业前提下相对丰富的基础，也是他与片名些许跑题的原因。
碎奖杯那里真的看乐了，金球奖杯都不配被碎掉是吗哈哈哈讽刺得也挺好挺幽默
20220706——176；去年的新片，对电影产业的讽刺具有极强的娱乐性和现实性。电影表达犀利，三位主演非常出色。
影片里戏中戏的故事原型，出自《杰出公民》主角的口述故事。
本着想去看看西班牙可惜都在室内 用排演影片的过程讲故事又全部在室内有点打瞌睡了😪
直白的讽刺电影圈各种陋习，演员表演是不错的，就是过于平淡直接，结尾有些潦草。
Penelope Cruz + Antonio Banderas + Óscar Martínez 这部黑色喜剧真的是one of my personal favs
75/100一部rivalry，自恃清高的老艺术家和老不正经的花花公子，被一个疯癫的导演骗来做假排练真社会试验了。讽刺行业内部的辛辣喜剧，演员表演占上风，但剧本一般般，特别是排练的这个故事对于一个拿了金棕榈银狮的导演有点太小儿科了吧。
因为这两周刚好在学script analysis 好神奇的观影体验 很灵动！
让演员都玩嗨了，吻戏真是有够特别的。导演应该也不准备去戛纳跟威尼斯了，把金棕榈跟银狮一起卷了。
我给5/10分，艺术，有人喜欢，有人就看不懂。被喜剧tag骗到了，看出来是讽刺，但大段的对白真的…
老生常谈且过于规整：无视霸凌的学校、没有好好倾听女儿心声的父亲、无形施压的新闻媒体、日本人骨子里被放大的罪感意识，成为连锁反应酿成一系列悲剧。透过一场本来可以从源头上避免的交通事故/社会事件，一定程度上反映了日本人的民族劣根性。最通透也最喜欢的角色是藤原季节。
制片人要抱艺术的大腿，倒也不坏，他们心中拍电影就像建一座桥，只要拿到冠名权便有机会永垂不朽，至于自己对艺术的一无所知，“对不起，我没读过一本书”，并不觉得羞耻；各位导演，尤其是有几分天份、又拿过电影节最高奖的知名导演，总是会吸引到金钱的注意，金钱又总与权力勾结，自然行使其权力也毫不掩饰，对演员的生杀予夺，既傲慢、又残忍，每一句训导都免不了言辞间的洋洋得意，对这样的佩内洛普克鲁兹真的不一定爱得起来，“要保持艺术家的活力，最好连孩子都不要生，会是拖累”；演员们则更是斯文扫地，不仅相互评判彼此的演技，还要对各自的价值观、生活方式讥讽一番。学院派嫉妒偶像派的高票房，除了指责生活作风不良，还要冠一个“迎合观众”的罪名；偶像派则用迟到来摆架子，还试图飙演技，极尽奢糜与粗俗之能事。似乎都不是什么好货色。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
