Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
我们的周边卖的很不错，赚的钱可以在世贸中心买大楼。
“就算他们很害怕，他们还是挺过来继续前进，所以他们才能成为英雄。/我看到的是一只勇敢的小狗，尽管你小到无法照顾自己，但是你依旧在对抗那些可怕的事情，然后站起来继续前进，我不是同情你才收养你，我是因为你是我最见过勇敢的狗狗才选择了你，我知道冒险城对你来说一直很难，但是我也知道你生来就是英雄。”
全球知名IP，融合了科幻，动作等元素，讲述了友情，忠诚与信任，自我救赎并突破自我，团队最终战胜邪恶。
好看，孩子们乐疯了！贝贝坐在摩托上发动的那一刻我也哭了，梦想成真的感觉，美死了😍😍😍
谢谢你让我知道 美国的片子也能一样的烂 不比国产烂片好那么一丁点
@缤谷广场 with小尧 老母亲带娃看动画片，破格打四星。作为一部儿童电影，还是不错的，逻辑呢则是不存在的。汪汪队的装备都巨牛逼啊，完全是来炫技的。
一部纯粹的外国片，虽然是给小孩看的，却满满的成年人的世界！
画风很low, 现在动画片越弄越回去了, 就这个画风不看上映日期，说它是10年前的都没问题~
三岁女儿人生中第一部在电影院看的电影必须五星好评
真的是配得上大电影的制作水准，多功能警车消防车直升机嘁哩喀喳的变形出击，哪个小孩能抵挡这样的诱惑，把我的钱拿去！拿去！
挺好看的呢！跟室友一致认为比同期萌鸡小队好看😅（跟室友都没看过这两部动画片）我笑点挺高的居然还笑了几次😄值得带娃去看！娃也很欢乐
虽然是陪娃看的，但感觉的确可以啊，虽然除了阿奇、天天和贝贝，没全都记住那些狗狗队员的名字，但是不得不说它们的座驾着实让人羡慕啊，画面也很好，情节也可，推荐，陪娃可以考虑刷起。
四岁的汪汪队老粉丝看完打1000分。确实全面升级，每只狗狗毛发毕现，每辆战车都能变形成两种形态，汪汪队新总部大楼高耸如云，战斗滑道酷炫屌炸天…以从业者的角度来说，尼克对低幼动画片的尺度和爽点把握也是老专家人儿了，不像某些动画片把场景和反派设计得让孩子看了有心理阴影。这片其实积压蛮久没上，否则里面夹带了骂川普的私货，包准紧跟时事，让大人看了都倍儿开心。。
看了开头和结尾，中间睡着了。儿子看的很激动
目标人群幼儿园小朋友，剧情都是套路，无非就团队啊，友爱啊，克服心理障碍勇敢突破啊这类东西，中间还插了个周边广告（……）。但就我这个大人来看电影质量并不糊弄和注水，也没有很尬的包袱，家里有幼儿的可以带去看。以及为什么没有“没有困难的工作，只有勇敢的狗狗”？
实在是很无聊，从入场开始睡睡到结束,孩子倒看的很开心
陪孩子看的，原以为会在电影院睡过去，结果全程看得津津有味，虽然情节简单但不降智，找回了久违的童心，是一部不错的合家欢电影。
画面不错，剧情都是那套模版，关键小孩子喜欢
南方巨兽楼被拍得毫无气势，大概就是本片失败的缩影
作为动画片很好哇，三观正，音乐好听，画面好看，角色可爱
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
