Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
老爷子轻微OOC，但至少动作戏份到位了，作剧集预热篇尚可。
看得蛮开心，又有血腥暴力，cult十足，只是男主还真是废柴啊，地下室自由以后不救妻一段真是费解
北欧犯罪题材电影一以贯之的血腥暴力，连血浆都是我见过最真实的。还有同样硬核的北欧语。
无粉丝滤镜，只看过大超版的真人剧。
看样子我没法看这种类型片，血浆四射实在令人抓狂……
3.5星。美术和音乐都非常契合原作和游戏，打戏很有亮点。不过这个故事其实有点俗套，而且和原作或者游戏剥离感有点严重。最后用秃头来隐藏彩蛋，我只能说真有你的啊。
白狼前传。老头还是纯情少年。交手太果断了，一刀断头。好久没玩游戏看见个妖灵水鬼都觉得亲切。
今年开局的《小人物》，然后年底这一部《在糟糕的日子里》，真的是有始有终，暴力美学血槽拉满，虽然还有很多瑕疵和槽点，但这个血腥程度我很喜欢
有点《鬼灭之刃》的感觉，但好像没有《鬼灭之刃》好看。
这都什么玩意。
韦瑟米尔大叔当年能打啊，一人战狮鹫大狮鹫还有别的无数怪物。女术士引怪攻凯尔莫汉解释了它现在建筑的破败。杰洛特小时候是个光头
意外故事讲得不错的纯粉丝向作品，凯尔莫罕的毁灭与新生，这法印的加强了太多，维瑟米尔颇具魅力。
感觉主角光环也太重了吧，前半段各怀鬼胎比较好看。
剧本核心概念讲的很好，画面一级，但是战斗力都离大谱
既然原著改，还是希望能摆脱游戏的“阴影”吧。（果然Nolan North又去客串了
我的妈呀 瞟一眼短评什么"头重脚轻 结尾草草结束" 这么浪漫而悲痛的结局还要加什么内容?
没看过原著 没玩过游戏 但是看完了之后 想玩游戏试试
这动画水平这帧数…..快去跟日本人好好学学吧….感觉是二十年前的动画效果….
2021 #48。非常一般。懒得写评论了。如果没看过猎魔人电视剧的没必要看这个动画。
不愧是网飞啊，先打打杀杀过足瘾，再抛出猎魔人存在的宿命，在一无所知的时候就出卖了自己正常人的一生，到头来所坚信的收钱打怪原来只是自导自演的收钱好戏。组织发展过程中，走入偏差偏离正道招致毁灭，悔改后留下希望，似乎有点熟悉，老灾难共和国了
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
