Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
图大耳朵图图那算数我们不论。
真是浪费我的钱 前面大半段都和以前看的动画片一模一样呃呃 看不下去就走啦
真的是不太好看，带小孩去看的，没看完就离场了
不过霸王龙小分队的主题曲真的很奇怪
最后，表白刷子，我永远喜欢张帅子😭可爱的小女孩😭小美也是小天使
柬埔寨之声，一种独立表达，开头骑摩托那场戏还挺好，后来就变得越来越薄，最好想意味深长一点，却是太薄了一点。
而且图图生活的这个世界好桃花源啊，虽然不是完美的，但是人和人之间的感情好美好😢
爸爸妈妈和孩子都很有感触，看完来了个爱的抱抱
剧情围绕当前人口老龄化增加这一社会现象，敬老爱老，关爱老人成为我们的共同话题，“关爱现在的老人，就是关心将来的自己”，动画画面颜色艳丽，孩子全程被剧情吸引，通过动画形式对孩子进行敬老爱老的教育，值得带孩子观看，有笑点也有泪点，推荐带孩子观看！
感觉像是曾经看的一集的扩写，因为有猜到剧情哈哈。
从小看图图的大朋友们可以看到小时候的味道，不过场景，人物动态和人物面部表情都是细节化生动化电影化。五六岁的孩子可以完全来看看对他们来说全新的图图。真的很推荐，家人们真的很推荐，是念着童年去看的，还是那种味道，有笑点，有泪点，能学到东西，可以带小孩子去看哦，让他们学学关爱老人。脑子里现在始终循环着霸王龙，霸王龙小分队冲鸭！
【柬埔寨】《钻石岛》的五年后，当年联合出品的Kavich Neang的企划最终问世。失去的建筑、留在这里的记忆、历史、琐事、士绅化以及依然灿烂的城市星夜，过去与现在在变迁中不断交汇发生；前半段是情节，后半段更多是实验，有些脱节的缺憾，但无碍它是个值得了解的经历。
太无聊了🥱，东拼西凑的情节。我就纳闷编剧不觉得很尬么？！
（5thPYIFF10.13卧虎）科长监制。一种介于第六代和东南亚电影之间的气质，白色大楼轰然崩塌，和故乡、情感、记忆一样。
童年最爱的动画片，电影很好看，把经典片段重现改编的很好
开头挺惊喜的，中间开始的剧情从不认识牛爷爷到给牛爷爷惊喜这段，在动画片里看过的，感觉有点无聊了，后面霸王龙小分队和牛爷爷一起到养老院给里面的爷爷奶奶表演节目，这里挺温馨的，总体还是可以的
爱吃爱玩本来就是小孩的天性 电影给到既定的关爱老人的主题有何不可 疼爱图图的牛爷爷的形象本来就是我们童年不可磨灭的回忆啊
带娃去看的，有点无聊，强行加塞温情的感觉……
但是这个电影，三分之二都在复刻动画片版，直接完全剧情照搬，三集动画片凑整的电影，真的不是在恰烂钱吗?
剧情围绕着关爱老人，回忆满满，但歌舞实在有点尬
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
