Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
张涵予范伟演的是真好，日本反派也相当出色。铁道游击队的故事有了新的演绎，我们这代看着黑白战争片长大的孩子，看到了彩色的故事。
电影质感不错 人物扁平了点，周也角色比较酱油片尾和歌曲不错
中年人。女人。22年老粉。nerd。这部电影是准准为我拍的。被狠狠地娱乐到，不论是做为正剧还是做为吐槽对象。能做到这样很不容易，good job everyone. 建议看前三部，不然很大概率会不喜欢。不过也说不定。也许会喜欢，只是梗没那么多。如果不喜欢，我也很能理解。但是我真的好喜欢。哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈。
送给粉丝们的安可。
演技全靠范伟，颜值全靠周也，其他人犹如木偶，节奏拖沓，鬼子和铁道队都有点莫名其妙的，结尾强行悲壮完全没必要，只能说题材可以拍的稀烂，最后向抗日英雄致敬！
范伟演得真不错，五花大绑的进站台，日军军官要跟他合影，笑着看镜头，说：畜生！
范伟老师个人把老王的角色丰满了起来，三次点烟细微处彰显演技，没有他这个角色不会那么生动，但反之，张涵予的刻板形象就没什么看头了，感觉都一个样
范伟大爷影帝！
应该给两星，但是中国电影市场不应该再拿出这样的作品给观众看，拒绝~
情怀，演员演技满分，剧情顺畅，不过为什么还要搞点神剧的东西可惜了
化身时间管理大师，安排了行程满满的一天，虽然错过了五分钟的开场，但好像也没有错过什么的感觉。
2022.01.05电视院线29。还会不会认真一点拍电影？导演就是个骗子。
个人评价：
大多数抗日题材影视一直被诟病，原因就在于不尊重历史，不尊重事实，甚至不尊重常识，不尊重观众的智商。《铁道英雄》虽不至于如此，却也没有如何。
手司鬼子，可以理解成革命浪漫主义吧。类型片套路有点老。也不够感人。还是以前拍的铁道游击队、地道战地雷战比较过瘾。
手司鬼子，可以理解成革命浪漫主义吧。类型片套路有点老。也不够感人。还是以前拍的铁道游击队、地道战地雷战比较过瘾。
正派抖精神大推运镜，反派掐指算推理达人；
从导演编剧到主演班子，看得出除了华纳根本没人想拍这续集，毕竟整体水准比《原力觉醒》更没诚意，文戏台词打戏武指都跌到了国内网剧水平。全片小家子气别扭得很，每三十秒掐着表狂暴轰入原作名场面混剪生怕观众忘了，但又不敢对这些回忆杀做任何剧本或情感上的直球回应，每次都是摆出一副「哈？我玩梗而已？认真你就输了？」般自作聪明的狡诈嘴脸。自嘲、玩梗、耍赖虚无主义、打破第四面墙，这些元素一穷二白的《废柴联盟》玩起来够味，但由当年引领着流行文化命脉的沃卓斯基整活也太掉价了。
这部作品从立项之初就注定了失败的结局，原三部曲已经做到了极致没有任何遗憾，华纳、导演和观众都知道这将是一部失败的作品，但就像狗改不了吃屎一样，在所有人的合谋中，这部狗屎还是被堂而皇之地拍了出来，江郎才尽的导演也深知挖不出什么新东西，便只能一边三分钟打斗三分钟闪回，一边吐槽都是华纳逼自己的，真是又可怜又可恨！
智取威虎山的成功与近年红色主旋律在商业市场上的持续升温，并不代表这类项目攒个不错的班底卡司就能值回票价，华谊近年颓势渐显恐怕也和经常踩不到点儿上有关系。铁道游击队的故事其实很适合电影改编，画面感扑面而来，但是本片呈现的效果来说却有些温吞，人物普遍比较脸谱化，剧本又缺乏足够抓人的点，用相声术语来说垫话太多耽误了正活儿，张涵予一如既往的正面英雄人物缺乏起伏变化，倒是范伟老师一如既往的不会让人失望，全片最让人动情的桥段戏份都在其个人魅力的发挥上，让整部片子的可看性抬到了及格线上良好线下的水平。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
