Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
可能因为预告片看太多了，所以前半部分差点意思，美国小姐的演技也是……比较青涩。但是从与黑奇异会面开始就精彩了！很爽很有趣！克里斯汀超美！看完更期待之后的故事了~
恐怖片既视感（但我仍然爱旺达！）
看过《旺达幻视》的，都会心疼旺达。从西景镇到多元宇宙，都不过是幻梦一场。
I love you in every universe 一顿哭
em……有点无语了。恐怖片就恐怖片嘛，还是只会jump scare那种。唉，青春一去不返，超级英雄也明日黄花。帕特里克是真的老得吓人了……最后吐槽一下明明可以飞，却为了模仿僵尸偏要脚踩玻璃渣然后一瘸一拐的旺达。
I love you in every universe.
史上最帅奇异博士！I love you in every universe！
感觉整个电影人都疯了 就是一部惊悚僵尸片还混合了摄魂怪 x教授出场居然没有什么轰动 光照会这批英雄死的也太干脆搞笑了 猩红女巫太厉害了 就是中间一段追杀感觉刻意搞成了恐怖片造型 明明可以更酷一点吧 但不是很理解为甚么一开始猩红女巫不去抓这个女主，还有为什么最后毁灭了dark code会每个宇宙的都消失了，那曾经的无限宝石呢……可能我想多了……最后并不想旺达死掉……不知道死没死
有jump scare，但是节奏没那么好，并且最后逆转获胜的理由太过于低智
打个7分吧
还不错！魔法的特效做的很眼花缭乱。剧情中规中矩，一贯的漫威电影水准。
复联四后第一部能看的 光照会很惊艳 希望不是消费了一下就完事了
旺达确实做出了过分的举动 害了不少性命 但我觉得这是一种很人性的体验 她不是圣母 也有情绪 特别是她还经历了那么多 旺达真的好强啊 杀疯了杀疯了
绯红女巫成反派，开头就是特效，恐怖片既视感，讲实话，奇异博士有点拉垮。绯红女巫变态级加强，英国队长（美队媳妇），X教授，神奇四侠友情客串。
I love you in every universe
旺达作为一个超能力女强人真的好可怜啊呜呜呜呜……她想做一个平凡的妻子、母亲，但是这个世道不允许。这个电影真的好好看但是友情提示真的很血腥！X-Man终于回归漫威宇宙了！观影顺序《旺达幻视》《蜘蛛侠英雄无归》《what if…》
旺达身材长相演技都不错，卷福西装挺帅。但漫威电影已经陷入剧本越来越蠢的地步。战斗力很迷很迷，且有了复联联动后，再单独看任何作品，都会有你队友呢？这样的疑问出现在脑海。也就看看特效打斗千万别带脑子！
4-
导演对恐怖片有什么执念，第一次见漫威融合这个元素，还挺新颖。不过用多了也烦，甚至有点想笑。
这超英团战比无敌少侠第一集还血腥。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
