Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
说假的自己去找找这帮乌纳到底做了什么，有幸见过一段纪实。
对美国文化和社会的贯穿描绘 真的好有趣 爱了
Sci-fi元素说实话并不多，也并不是一个太空科普片。前半部分描述60s美国家庭的故事还可以，但呈现故事中心思想的效果一般，大体就是日常和男孩的航天梦，把它定位为加入一些Sci-fi元素的怀旧日常片，或许更为合适。另一方面，当时平民存在不想浪费钱在太空事业的思想，然而这么多年过去，即便人们再无登月，饥荒遏制了吗？钱财回到平民手上了吗？
没想到是动画片，还可以，那个时代的一个缩影
观看此片请抛开立场，只探讨人道主义。
没什么重点 属于那种边看边回想往事的电影 虽然没有什么启发但是有一个放空自己的时间也挺好的
这是林克莱特的少年太空梦，更像是为了弥补当年因为睡着错过直播的遗憾，文艺男也可以这么可爱啊哈哈，他在梦中见证了这一历史性时刻…
无厘头的战争，无知无谓的一群人，受伤的总是民众
we are all together on this floating blue ball in space, somehow it still seems like a dream...
挺有意思的，有关60年代阿美瑞肯小孩的童年，画风很棒
这种rotoscope的动画技术真实但又很诡异。结尾妈妈那句“how memory works”不要说就好了。总体就是一篇文章可以搞定的事情拍了一部电影。
导演的童年私人回忆和幻想，其实每个人在内心深处都会有类似的情感吧。
儿童的视角往往是新奇又有趣的，故事的穿插不显突兀，直到最后那句话“12个人和一个儿童到过月球，但从未成功回来”才点醒了我，这是一场梦，一个童话。
从电影本身来看，拍的还可以，但其实可以拍的更好。有些场景调度和片子节奏其实可以优化，结尾的那段有点假。我觉得还是太电影了，也太克制，太倾向于讲故事了。片子说完，说历史背景的角度，如果不是俄乌冲突，是真不知道顿巴斯那些地区14年开始平民就持续的遭受炮击。冲突开始后特意去搜索才发现14年其实有很多相关的录像和资料，只是全世界基本都没怎么报道过。美俄的斗争看每个人的立场，但炮击平民和新纳粹的确是反人类的罪行。可惜没人关注，甚至还为纳粹洗白。实在是。。。
65/100 拟真化动画还蛮特别的，这风格确实有种复古的感觉。其实不是太空登月只是一个引子，主要的故事还是记录60年代美式生活和流行文化的点滴，配合着旁白更有种导演自己回望青春的纪录片感。
没有前因后果，剧情脉络过于简单直白，作为一部电影甚至有些不合格，就是乌克兰单方面的侵略。岁月静好是无数牺牲换来的，战争过后才会带来和平，一直强大才能一直和平。
其他部分就有些平淡
一个很棒的美国六七十年代怀旧篇，中间穿插了小镇青年的幻想。将当时的童年生活娓娓道来，很细水长流。
要给徐慢儿同款幸福
电影血肉模糊的呈现了一场发生在地球另一边的战争。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
